What is the current F14 state?

[James Laska]

On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:21 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> It seemed to me that preupgrade process should not require any user
> interactions. I've used this tool twice on this system and I do not
> recall that I had to provide any user input.

Preupgrade should, preupgrade itself is the tool that prepares the
system for an upgrade.  But preupgrade should prepare a system that
performs an unattended upgrade.  From what I can tell, all indications
are that was what was happening, and then the system was rebooted.

> > or was
> > still in the middle of performing package upgrade %scripts and rebooted.
> 
> Maybe. However, it seems to me that the update of 420 packages should
> not take so long. That's why I turned off the box.

Again, just my best guesses based on your logs.  The best way to find
out is to actively monitor the upgrade process first-hand.

> Unfortunately, on my laptop virtualization is not working too fast, so
> it'll not check whether preupgrade actually works well. But maybe
> someone else will find the time to check.
> 
> Thanks for your analysis.

Anytime, thanks for sharing your experiences and logs!

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20101004/716b75f3/attachment-0001.bin