Release criteria proposal: release notes

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Oct 18 23:46:41 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/18/2010 04:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> * The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
> the release repository in packaged form (both fedora-release-notes and
> generic-release-notes)

Works for me.

> * A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files
> used to build the official live images must be present in the release
> repository. The included kickstarts must define the correct set of
> release repositories

"used to build the release"  since it covers the install set/tree, the
"official live media" and the "Spins" (all of which are different
distinct items).

> 
> * A fedora-release package and a generic-release package appropriately
> versioned and containing the correct names, information and repository
> configuration for a final Fedora release (as opposed to a pre-release)
> must be present in the release repository

Works for me.

> 
> (I'm not sure the criteria is the correct place to document what
> 'correct repository configuration' ought to be, it results in a very
> long-feeling criterion).

Indeed, good call.

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAky83GEACgkQ4v2HLvE71NWFCQCfWkhjsfR1cfZshCuyYl8/c9x6
FiMAnj6GJCzaug++LnuwKOcb/o/SEq86
=VswX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the test mailing list