Release criteria proposal: fedora release artwork
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Sep 10 16:20:34 UTC 2010
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 12:06 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:18 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings gang,
> > >
> > > From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we
> > > need release criteria to describe how best to prioritize issues related
> > > to Fedora release artwork. I took an action item to draft up 2 criteria
> > > to describe the expectations around release artwork before Final, and
> > > for the Final release.
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose the following criteria. As always, comments welcome
> > > and encouraged.
> > >
> > > = Fedora 14 Alpha =
> > > * The default Fedora artwork used must either refer to the current
> > > Fedora release under development (Fedora 14), or reference an interim
> > > release milestone (e.g. Alpha or Beta). If a release version number is
> >
> > This should just say 'Alpha'. There's no situation in which it would be
> > okay for the Alpha to say it's the Beta. =)
>
> I was trying to capture the scenario mizmo described where the
> design-team would have milestone specific artwork for the Alpha and
> Beta, instead of general development release artwork. For example, it
> might have the words, "Alpha" or "Beta" in the artwork.
Oh, I see, that makes sense.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the test
mailing list