Karma feedback needed for anaconda-15.26-1, systemd-23-1.fc15 and filesystem-2.4.40-1.fc15

[James Laska]

On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > If you have a moment, and spare hardware/guest, please add karma
> > > feedback to:
> > >       *
> > >       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-15.26-1.fc15
> > >       *
> > >       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/filesystem-2.4.40-1.fc15
> > >       * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/systemd-23-1.fc15
> > 
> > Note that disabling SELinux via config file with just the above
> > updates
> > is going to fail and cause the system to be unbootable, due to
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692573 . To fix that you
> > also need an updated libselinux, once the build succeeds.
> 
> I'm confused. Are you talking about using jlaska's boot.iso or about people updating their existing installation?
> 
> My experience with jlaska's boot.iso:
> 1. The installation proceeds fine.

+1 for anaconda seems appropriate

> 2. The system won't boot without selinux=0.
> 3. With selinux=0 the system boots, but firstboot crashes on last page ("send hardware profile") and thus restarts on every boot.

Looks like we'll need a bug against firstboot.  Is there a firstboot
traceback file in /tmp ?

> Is that +1 or -1 karma for aforementioned updates?

I'm also trying to understand where things are the with the SELinux
issues.  Does installing selinux-policy-3.9.16-12.fc15 make a
difference?

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110405/07b7a2f5/attachment.bin