What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 22 22:29:56 UTC 2011


On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Jason D. Clinton <me at jasonclinton.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 14:32, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well you'd want to be able to exclude it as well and adding it as an
>>> artificial dep to something like gnome-session won't allow it to be
>>> removed.
>>
>> GNOME Shell is the shell of GNOME 3 and thus depending on the GNOME Shell
>> from the gnome-session from GNOME 3 is not artificial but rather a
>> requirement. The fallback mode is intended as a fallback for driver and VM
>> problems, not as first-class desktop environment. You will be allowed to
>> force it to use the fallback mode should the detection fail to understand
>> your hardware but that's not quite there yet. See here:
>>
>> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-January/msg00008.html
>>
>> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2011-January/msg00138.html
>>
>> So, doing what you describe from the UI makes a lot more sense (and
>> explaining why) from a user perspective than, "If you drivers don't work do
>> this magic with the package manager." The former is helpful; the later is
>> pain.
>
> what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about?

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html


More information about the test mailing list