Any hope for system-config-services ?
agraham at g-b.net
Fri Jul 22 00:58:41 UTC 2011
On 07/21/2011 12:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote:
>> Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that
>> statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years
>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :(
> It should concern you very much that you are accusing a long term
> contributor of 7 years like me of having a secret agenda. There isn't
> one. Any reasonable person would agree (and smolt stats can verify)
> that Fedora's shorter life cycle and agility isn't a good fit for
> servers typically. If you want Fedora to have a long lifecyle and be
> a good fit for servers, be my guest and volunteer to do the work and I
> am happy to volunteer along with you. Otherwise, you are just
> engaging in back seat driving.
Rahul, I did not accuse you of anything except your outstanding
contribution. I did say "I really get the feeling there is another
agenda at work here" and what I was hinting at, was that Redhat are
setting the Fedora agenda such that it NEVER becomes stable.
And a later post affirms my exact concern (see further down this thread).
More information about the test