Proposed release criteria revisions

[James Laska]

On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, all. I'm currently poking at the release criteria to try and
> > address a few issues that have come up during blocker meetings. I have
> > drafts of revised versions of all three pages up:
> 
> So aside from the long sidetrack, I didn't get any negative feedback on
> these, so I plan to push them soon.
> 
> I'd like to propose one additional change. I'd like to extend this Beta
> criterion:
> 
> "The installer must be able to successfully complete an upgrade
> installation from a clean, fully updated default installation of the
> previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by booting to
> the installer manually "
> 
> To read:
> 
> "The installer must be able to successfully complete an upgrade
> installation from a clean, fully updated default installation of the
> previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by booting to
> the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all release
> criteria"
> 
> to make it clear that we want upgraded systems to work to the same level
> as new installs, we don't just want the upgrade process to succeed.
> 
> Sound okay? thanks!

This sounds great ... and I believe lines up with the tests that Hurry
and others have been running on upgraded systems.

ACK!

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110329/70143173/attachment.bin