F16 Beta Blocker Bug Review #5 minutes
Tim Flink
tflink at redhat.com
Fri Sep 23 18:13:12 UTC 2011
======================================
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-blocker-review
======================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-23/f16-beta-blocker-review.2011-09-23-17.00.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-23/f16-beta-blocker-review.2011-09-23-17.00.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-23/f16-beta-blocker-review.2011-09-23-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* rollcall (tflink, 17:01:07)
* why are we here? (tflink, 17:05:57)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink, 17:06:10)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
(tflink, 17:06:36)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (tflink, 17:07:06)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736793 (tflink, 17:08:03)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736793 (tflink,
17:08:07)
* gdm 3.1.90-1 No way to reboot or shutdown system from gdm (tflink,
17:08:17)
* LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253 (tflink,
17:08:59)
* agreed that the beta release critera are a bit too strict, should be
modified such that this isn't a bug (tflink, 17:27:07)
* the release criteria could be reworded to say there needs to be a
working way to shut gracefully using a gui interface. So if you can
shutdown from either gdm or gnome (for desktop spin) things are good
enough for beta. (tflink, 17:28:23)
* AGREED: - 736793 - RejectedBlocker - This bug does hit the release
criteria but the fix involves pulling in a new version of shell and
other packages - too big to retest this late. This will be fixed by
final (tflink, 17:29:00)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737532 (tflink, 17:29:56)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737532 (tflink,
17:30:00)
* FormatDestroyError: error wiping old signatures from /dev/sda-1: 1
(tflink, 17:30:09)
* AGREED: - 737532 - AcceptedNTH - This is a fix for a bug that came
out of another NTH, would be nice to have fixed for beta (tflink,
17:31:46)
* Unable to make system bootable due to bootloader choice (tflink,
17:32:52)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738964 (tflink,
17:33:01)
* needs testing with
http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6.img (tflink,
17:34:11)
* there is an alternative update available that doesn't use quite so
big of a hammer -
http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6.img (tflink,
17:35:16)
* there are patches on anaconda-devel@ that should be built in to
today, no problems expected in getting a new build (tflink,
17:36:33)
* (739746) dhcp / bind mismatch on f15 to f16 upgrade: no network
(tflink, 17:37:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739746 (tflink,
17:37:40)
* builds are available, need more testing and karma (tflink,
17:37:56)
* (739253) - unable to shut down from gdm greeter (tflink, 17:38:43)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253 (tflink,
17:38:49)
* this particular bug could be fixed by pulling in gdm-3.1.92 only
without the rest of that update (tflink, 17:45:41)
* gnome-shell still wouldn't have PM options @ gdm greeter, but what
is there would work (tflink, 17:46:03)
* pulling in gdm-3.1.92 needs more testing to verify that it can be
pulled in alone (tflink, 17:48:46)
* AGREED: - 739253 - Assuming that it can be pulled in by itself,
pulling in gdm-3.1.92 alone sounds like a reasonable solution to fix
this particular bug even though it won't touch 736793. This needs to
be tested more before pulling it in to beta release, though
(tflink, 17:50:40)
* (738735) repoclosure failure for 16-Beta.RC1 DVD (tflink, 17:51:11)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738735 (tflink,
17:51:17)
* LINK: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13116
(tflink, 17:52:27)
* digikam was recently pushed to stable (tflink, 17:52:42)
* this bug should be fixed @ next compose (tflink, 17:52:51)
* AGREED: - 738735 - Need to confirm fixed in RC2 and close (tflink,
17:53:54)
* (737731) Bootloader is left in F15 configuration when preupgrading to
F16 (tflink, 17:54:04)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (tflink,
17:54:14)
* fix for this will be in F15's preupgrade (tflink, 17:54:46)
* since fix for 737731 is in F15, it isn't blocking compose (tflink,
17:55:43)
* proposed solution in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731#c13 (tflink,
17:56:36)
* (735866) boot hangs with udevadm settle - timeout of 120 seconds
(tflink, 17:59:09)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735866 (tflink,
17:59:15)
* AGREED: - 735866 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedNTH - This has turned out
to be a little less common and severe than we originally thought. If
it turns out to be a bigger issue, re-propose as blocker (tflink,
18:04:41)
* open floor (tflink, 18:05:21)
* ACTION: tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the
updates for 738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what
we're looking for in testing and data for feedback (tflink,
18:07:26)
* digikam update for 738735 had issues with pushing for stable, it has
been fixed and should show up with the next push to stable (tflink,
18:08:25)
* next blocker meeting (if needed) will be 2011-09-30 @ 17:00 UTC
(tflink, 18:09:31)
Meeting ended at 18:10:53 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the updates for
738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what we're looking for
in testing and data for feedback
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
* tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the updates for
738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what we're looking
for in testing and data for feedback
* tflink
* tflink or adamw send out request for testing BOTH of the updates for
738964, explaining why there are 2 updates and what we're looking
for in testing and data for feedback
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (157)
* jdulaney (41)
* adamw (39)
* nirik (24)
* brunowolff (19)
* buggbot (15)
* jsmith (10)
* zodbot (5)
* fenrus02 (2)
* clumens (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110923/0c3f15ee/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list