An arbitrarily sized /tmp does not fit all

Karel Volný kvolny at redhat.com
Mon Dec 24 14:07:18 UTC 2012


Dne So 22. prosince 2012 01:03:53, Chris Murphy napsal(a):
> On Dec 22, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Please keep this pointless regurgitation of old arguments off test at .
> > It's bad enough on devel at . The discussion has been had, and escalated,
> > and settled, and had again, and again. Please just stop it now. Move on.
> 
> My suggestion to the whiners is to go look at FESCO meet logs going back
> 9-12 months ago, see who voted for/against, and if you don't like how
> people on FESCO voted, then vote for other people next time around.

cool, so just because of disagreement on one thing in the past we should 
choose someone else - now just lend me your crystall ball please to tell me 
whom should I vote for, who will vote in all future features the 100% the same 
as I would vote ...

> Otherwise, it's pretty much a STFU moment. It's an old debate.

I don't think so ... it was discussed (see e.g. the ticket #940) that it may 
be re-evaluated after it gets broader testing - which is right now, and I find 
it pretty stupid, a complete failure of the process, that it got re-evaluated 
*before* there was a some time for the feedback (especially considering the 
fact that there was a problem with the installer itself, so many people didn't 
get to testing F18 earlier)

K.

-- 
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol at jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."


More information about the test mailing list