obsolete http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda_Boot_Options
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Wed May 9 18:01:13 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/09/2012 01:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:31:42 -0400, Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400, Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why do have both "enforcing=0" and "selinux=0"?
>>>
>>> Because they are different. enforcing=0 will run selinux in permissive
>>> mode, selinux=0 will disable selinux.
>>
>> Exactly. Doesn't disabling selinux for that particular boot not override
>> setting selinux to run in permissive mode? It doesn't make sense to use
>> both simultaneously.
>
> If you use selinux=0 it doesn't matter what enforcing is set to. So you
> could change things so that there was one flag with three states instead to
> two flags with 2 states each.
And if we had a way back machine we maybe could do that...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk+qsOkACgkQrlYvE4MpobNNQgCeKQvu8JTSi/WNZ7K1CAwrYDxr
OB0AnRP2DHzzlzyclEzwVjsFroWNsjyr
=aPG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the test
mailing list