nfsiso release criterion change proposal

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 14:48 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On today's blocker bug meeting, we agreed that we don't need to require both NFS and NFSISO to work for Beta, just one is enough. Anaconda team claims NFSISO support has a lot of issues that are hard to solve.
> 
> Current Beta criterion reads:
> 
> " The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options "
> 
> The new proposed Beta wording is:
> 
> " The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and either NFS or NFSISO remote package source options "
> 
> The current Final criterion reads:
> 
> " The installer must be able to use all supported local and remote package source options "
> 
> As you can see, that doesn't need to change, includes both NFS and NFSISO.

Seems simple enough to me. I'm a bit leery of whether it's entirely
clear what 'NFSISO' is if you don't already know, but hell, that's
hardly the *worst* problem we have with clarity in the criteria :) ack!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net