Partitioning criteria revision proposal

[Clyde E. Kunkel]

On 10/11/2012 06:15 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> <snip>
> Am I interpreting this correctly to mean that a beta can go out without
> support for software RAID and/or LVM, as long as they are not offered in
> the Anaconda interface?  If so, uugh.
>
> Also if the intent isn't to support "every bizarre permutation", what
> combinations are required to work (if any)?
>
> My specific concern is LVM on top of software RAID.  I've been running
> said configuration since at least RHL 8, and I'm getting pretty tired of
> having Anaconda break on it every 2 or 3 releases.  I try to do my part
> by testing, but ...
> <snip>
> Could we at least have a no regressions criterion?
>

+1

-- 
Regards,
OldFart