Importance of LVM (was Re: Partitioning criteria revision proposal)

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 10/25/2012 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On this topic...Ric Wheeler came up with some fairly good arguments in
> favour of keeping the LVM default and proposed it on the anaconda list
> this morning (actually I think the post may not have been approved yet,
> but it'll show up soon). Since we're post-freeze now I summarized the
> debate into a bug report and nominated it for NTH:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870207
>
> I think it's still true to say that our*original*  reasons for
> defaulting to LVM don't really hold any more, but Ric made some pretty
> decent*current*  arguments for keeping that default until we switch to
> btrfs-by-default.

First of all this has been known this whole time  Ric is not bringing 
anything new to the table and I nack to this proposal it's to dam late 
in the release cycle to change this now and if we change this it means 
we have to slip another week to properly test anaconda with lvm as 
default against the alpha and beta criteria

Can we please stop messing around with the installer!

JBG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20121025/4f24f773/attachment.html>