any report of fedup f19->f20?

[Temlakos]

On 12/19/2013 12:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
>
>
>>>> The newest version of fedup available to me (not using
>>>> updates-testing) is 0.7. ne
>>>>
>>>> Is someone going to push fedup version 0,8 to updates (stable) soon?
>>>> Do I wait for that? Or enable updates-testing and run an update before
>>>> I proceed?
>>> It's on its way to stable updates ATM so if you wait you won't have to
>>> wait long, but it's perfectly safe to grab it from u-t if you want to
>>> upgrade right now.
>> I'm not in that kind of hurry. I saw a statement about known issues
>> with updating. The official line seems to be: fedup version 0.7 will
>> not work, so don't try it. Either wait, or enable u-t just long enough
>> to grab version 0.8. (And if one does try it, the new fedup needs
>> workarounds to clean up the garbage.)
>>
>> Since fedora-release also is at issue (for GPG signature checking),
>> I'll watch the system updates closely for the new fedup.
> It went to stable for f19 last night, should be making it to mirrors by
> now. f18 seems to be a bit behind.
>
>> My last experience with fedup was instructive. Plymouth ran well with
>> it, but showed me a very small progress bar that appeared frozen for a
>> long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I
>> probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see,
>> in America we have a saying: "A watched teapot never boils."
> It's an old English saying in fact :)

OK, the current version of fedup made it out, and I now have it.

But: shouldn't I also wait for fedup-dracut and fedup-plymouth-dracut to 
update also? They're still on Version 0.7.

Temlakos