ABRT - Processing failed?

Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc at redhat.com
Mon Feb 25 12:33:43 UTC 2013


On 02/25/2013 11:13 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:02:33 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
>> - it means that the report data doesn't contain 'installed_package' field
>>
>> - Updating to the latest abrt should help:
>> abrt-2.1.1
>> libreport-2.1.1
>> btparser-0.25
>>
>> F18: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2111
>> F17: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2124
>
> How likely is it that the fix is incomplete? I'm running Rawhide and those
> packages are installed here for a longer time already:
>
>    $ rpm -qi abrt libreport btparser|grep ^Ins
>    Install Date: Fri 08 Feb 2013 09:14:47 PM CET
>    Install Date: Fri 08 Feb 2013 09:14:45 PM CET
>    Install Date: Sun 03 Feb 2013 02:42:28 PM CET
>
>    $ rpm -q abrt libreport btparser
>    abrt-2.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64
>    libreport-2.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64
>    btparser-0.25-1.fc19.x86_64
>
> Last occurrence for the nm-applet crash is 2013-02-23. It's still listed
> in abrt-gui as "not reported", and trying to report it still fails in
> the described way.
>
> Should I simply delete it? And when ABRT will catch it again, it
> would save report data including the 'installed_package' field?
>

- deleting it should help
- the original problem has been generated with older version with this 
bug and the installed_packages are missing and since all the consequent 
crashes are marked as duplicates and the content is not updated, so the 
installed_package is still missing

--Jirka


More information about the test mailing list