Youtube, not all songs-videos can be played, F19_64

Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv at gmail.com
Sat Jul 13 01:23:46 UTC 2013


On Jul 12, 2013 4:15 PM, "Michael Schwendt" <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:35:32 -0400 (EDT), Joerg Lechner wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > in that file, that Adobe classifies as "Yum" there seems Adobe presents
an older Flash Plugin version. The version classified by Adobe as "rpm" is
-as I have seen- the newest and with Firefox working version.
> > Kind Regards and thanks for advice and help
>
> Why didn't you quote any version numbers or show command-line queries?
> What version difference have you noticed where? Details, please.
>
>
> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
>
> | YUM for Linux (YUM)
> |
> | Adobe Flash Player version 11.2.202.297
> | Your system: Linux 64-bit, Firefox | 4.3 KB
>
> | .rpm for other Linux
> |
> | Adobe Flash Player version 11.2.202.297
> | Your system: Linux 64-bit, Firefox | 6.88 MB
>
> $ rpm -q flash-plugin
> flash-plugin-11.2.202.297-release.x86_64
>
> $ yum list flash-plugin
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
> Installed Packages
> flash-plugin.x86_64           11.2.202.297-release
@adobe-linux-x86_64
>
> --
> Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64
> loadavg: 0.05 0.03 0.05
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

I am yum installing the release.x86_64 package rather than the yum package.
Will there any problem with this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20130712/c0ca01ee/attachment.html>


More information about the test mailing list