Most latest mirrors for fedora

[Bill Nottingham]

Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) said: 
> Note that the situation with sssd is a bit complex. The broken update
> was submitted for updates-testing on 06-12 at 12:01, and pushed to
> updates-testing on 06-12 at 12:41. It was then marked to be 'unpushed' -
> i.e. taken off the mirrors - on 06-13 at 01:28. A fixed sssd package was
> then added to the update and submitted for updates-testing on 06-13 at
> 10:56, and pushed to updates-testing on 06-13 at 15:53.
> 
> I'm not sure whether unpushes require any manual action or if they
> happen automatically, but if the unpush actually happened, then there
> was a time when the 'most current' state of the mirrors would have an
> *older* sssd package than a 'less current' state of the mirrors - a
> 'less current' mirror would still have the broken update, but a 'more
> current' mirror would have had it removed. It's not _always_ the case
> that the mirror with a higher-versioned package is the more up to date.
> 99% of the time, but not always.

Unless something has changed in the bodhi infrastructure, 'unpush' just
means 'untagged from updates-testing', and won't actually be reflected
on any mirror until the next updates compose/push is done for that release.

Bill