Proposed changes to blocker bug meeting processes

[Jaroslav Reznik]

----- Original Message -----
> On 21/02/13 01:11 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> We discussed a few possible changes to the blocker bug meeting
> >> process
> >> at the QA meeting this week. It was agreed that I'd draft up these
> >> changes for list discussion. So here they are! Sent to test@ and
> >> devel@
> >> as QA, devel and releng are the stakeholders in this process: I'm
> >> figuring releng folks are all subscribed to one list or the other.
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_meeting
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_process
> >>
> > As it did these moves during F18 cycle, it makes sense. Also I hope
> > F19
> > won't be such beast as F18 (yeah, hope :D). With automatic blocker
> > status
> > for specific bug types, I think we are going the good direction!
> > Thanks
> > guys!
> 
> Thanks for the feedback, Jaro and others. As per the discussion at
> the
> meeting on Monday, I've gone ahead and put these changes into
> production. So everyone remember to use #fedora-blocker-review for
> the
> next blocker meeting :)

Thank you Adam!

R.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test