Licensing? Was: Removing Optical Boot Requirement from F20 Alpha Release Requirements
Chris Murphy
lists at colorremedies.com
Thu Sep 19 22:13:20 UTC 2013
On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Not speaking to any issues of legality or non-legality, but fairly sure he's
> referring to the FAT driver in the EFI bios itself, which would have to be
> distributed in the EFI bios used by QEMU/KVM for virtual systems. It's not
> the linux kernel driver.
I understand that distinction but as there is a FAT driver in the linux kernel distributed with Fedora, I don't see why it's suddenly a problem for an EFI virtual firmware that needs a FAT driver to ship with Fedora.
Also, Virtualbox includes a UEFI virtual firmware that can read EFI FAT and it's also open source and isn't run afoul of licensing issues insofar as I'm aware.
Chris Murphy
More information about the test
mailing list