I don't believe what I just saw ...

[Tom Horsley]

On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:14:01 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:

> As I just posted in the bug, the one thing I still don't understand is
> whether this is intentional (and if so, why) or a bug.

Yea, why should it ever rebuild any initramfs for any reason
if they are already there unless it has specific kernel updates
to apply to a specific initramfs? The comments in the bug talking
about making the process smarter don't make any sense - it is
already way too smart it seems :-).