fedora in 2013

[Tim Flink]

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:27:44 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> >> If we want to free time to work on stuff like this Anaconda release
> >> cycle and testing must be finished before alpha or dealt with after
> >> beta.
> > Sure, that could end up being useful but it's but one piece of the
> > puzzle. It looks like 2014 is going to be an interesting year with
> > all the potential changes coming up. Summing all that up as
> > "everything would be OK if we could just change anaconda's
> > dev/release cycle" is a bit simplistic and a touch naive.
> 
> To you it might seem naive to be it's a key factor since once the
> needed changes have been made to Anaconda's release cycle we will see
> how much free resources we have and where we can allocate those
> resources like to what extend we need push work into their relevant
> sub-community and what's needed for the QA community members role
> ( testing/triaging ) etc.

I didn't say that the proposal itself was naive - just the idea that if
we changed the anaconda dev/release cycle, everything would suddenly be
better and all of our problems would be addressed.

Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20140106/66d87def/attachment.sig>