Very rough storage validation matrix draft

Al Dunsmuir al.dunsmuir at sympatico.ca
Mon Mar 17 19:12:19 UTC 2014


On Monday, March 17, 2014, 2:47:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>> What does everyone think? Thanks!
> Device tests:

> -PATA? They aren't made anymore, do we really need to distinguish
> between SATA and PATA? Is there a case where it worked on one but
> not the other? I'd think we'd sooner want SATA vs SAS, at least they use a different driver.

On ARM the majority will be MMC, with some SATA that may involve USB.
On PPC (secondary arch) SCSI is still quite important.






More information about the test mailing list