2015-06-01 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - Minutes

Adam Williamson adamwill at fedoraproject.org
Mon Jun 15 20:04:47 UTC 2015


==================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==================================


Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:11 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-06-15/fedora-qa.2015-06-15-15.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call  (adamw, 15:00:21)

* Previous meeting follow-up  (adamw, 15:06:20)
  * there appear to be no action items from last time  (adamw, 15:06:38)
  * there's nothing requiring follow-up from 2015-06-01 meeting  (adamw,
    15:08:10)

* Fedora 23 schedule / status / planning  (adamw, 15:08:17)
  * the current F23 schedule is available at
    https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-quality-tasks.html
    (adamw, 15:08:35)
  * we have some thoughts on overhauling the release validation process
    to be more nightly-based and CI-ish and removing or downplaying the
    significance of Alpha and Beta releases, but these are probably F24
    or later stuff with the shortish F23 cycle  (adamw, 15:21:44)
  * releng is working on having full TC/RC-style nightly composes during
    F23 cycle (not just lives and boot.iso)  (adamw, 15:22:02)
  * we'll do the first blocker review meeting on 06-22 to get out in
    front of the proposed blockers  (adamw, 15:26:09)
  * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1444   (roshi, 15:30:27)
  * roshi notes that there is a current discussion around shipping
    post-release respins for some images:
    https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1444 . This obviously has
    significant QA implications  (adamw, 15:32:00)
  * existing live respins - http://tinyurl.com/Live-respins - are semi-
    (or quarter-?) official and have no official QA process  (adamw,
    15:35:42)
  * we have a consensus that respins shouldn't be released without some
    kind of testing commitment in place, and the WGs responsible for the
    media to be respun need to help provide the resources to do the
    testing and demonstrate that it's actually occurred  (adamw,
    15:46:55)

* Fedora 22 retrospective  (adamw, 15:49:14)
  * AGREED: F22 process tweaks like more nightly validation, earlier
    blocker review and openQA all worked pretty well, we'll continue
    with them for F23  (adamw, 16:06:16)
  * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217844 was a victim of
    a secretarialization mistake during blocker review, let's remember
    to double-check our work for F23 :)  (adamw, 16:06:56)

* Open floor  (adamw, 16:07:01)
  * LINK:
    https://roshi.fedorapeople.org/heroes-of-fedora-hof-fedora-22-part-1.html
    (roshi, 16:11:31)

Meeting ended at 16:13:14 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (127)
* roshi (62)
* tflink (40)
* danofsatx (27)
* FranciscoD (21)
* dgilmore (13)
* zodbot (5)
* randomuser (3)
* satellit (3)
* kparal (1)
* jjmcd (1)
* satellit_e (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the test mailing list