<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/21/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeremy Katz</b> <<a href="mailto:katzj@redhat.com">katzj@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 09:43 -0600, Justin Conover wrote:<br>> On 11/21/05, Roger Grosswiler <<a href="mailto:roger@gwch.net">roger@gwch.net</a>> wrote:<br>> > On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 14:36 +0100, Roger Grosswiler wrote:
<br>> >> Is not FC5-T1 available by today? According to schedule, it<br>> should....<br>><br>> Possibly Wednesday<br><br>Yes, we ran into a few snags that took longer than expected when trying
<br>to freeze the tree. The current plan is to have the tree available on<br>Wednesday (fingers crossed :-)<br><br>Jeremy<br><br>--</blockquote><div><br>
Two things that would be interesting from you blog is <br>
<br>
gcc 4.1<br>
and<br>
GNOME-2.14<br>
<br>
down side is gnome is scheduled for March 15 2006<br>
<a href="http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen">http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen</a><br>
<br>
Fedora 5 is scheduled for February 2006<br>
<a href="http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/">http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Now I know dates tend to slip, and I would love to see this one slip a little more ;)<br>
</div><br></div><br>