<div>Ops, on the how to triage page.</div><br><br>Regards,<br><br>- -<br>iarly selbir | ski0s<br><br>:wq!<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:50 AM, iarly selbir | ski0s <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:iarlyy@gmail.com">iarlyy@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>The version shouldn't be <b>10, 11 and rawhide</b> on point 6?</div><div> </div><div>Regards,<br></div><br>- -<br>iarly selbir | ski0s<br><br>:wq!<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Adam Williamson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:awilliam@redhat.com" target="_blank">awilliam@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi, folks!<br>
<br>
So, we're nearing the final stretch of the severity / priority<br>
project. :)<br>
<br>
I have, as I noted previously, added some text to the triage guide to<br>
cover this:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/How_to_Triage#Checklist_for_NEW_Bug_Triage" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/How_to_Triage#Checklist_for_NEW_Bug_Triage</a> (section 9)<br>
<br>
I have now added a section to the bug lifecycle page with a more<br>
complete and formal explanation, partly taken from the Beland 'Legend'<br>
draft page where we kicked around the competing systems:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#Priority_and_Severity" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#Priority_and_Severity</a><br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Beland/Bugzilla_Legend#Severity_and_Priority" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Beland/Bugzilla_Legend#Severity_and_Priority</a><br>
<br>
I'll send an announcement to -devel-list soon. So, now, the priority /<br>
severity project is officially Open. BugZappers, please, if you haven't<br>
been already, start assigning a severity to all bugs as you triage them,<br>
according to the information above. This will be taken seriously and<br>
used in various ways.<br>
<br>
Talking about use, I will soon send out a review of bugs open on Rawhide<br>
and marked 'critical' severity. I'd like to have a review of this set of<br>
bugs each week. I don't necessarily want to be the one doing it,<br>
however. :) It'd be an ideal project for a community member: it's quite<br>
straightforward and requires no secret sauce, all you have to do is take<br>
a quick look at a saved query each week, do some copy/paste-ing, and<br>
pontificate. :) Let me know if you'd be interested in doing this.<br>
<br>
We'll also be reviewing all 'critical' bugs (and, if we get ambitious,<br>
even 'high' bugs in key components) during the blocker bug review<br>
meetings for F12, and the triage metric system will probably use the<br>
severity ratings for some metrics too.<br>
<br>
Thanks everyone who contributed on this project!<br>
--<br>
Adam Williamson<br>
Fedora QA Community Monkey<br>
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org<br>
<a href="http://www.happyassassin.net" target="_blank">http://www.happyassassin.net</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
fedora-test-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com" target="_blank">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a><br>
To unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>