<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div>Hi Michel, <br><br>In my opinion you are wrong because:<br><br>Fact: update repo has broken packages.<br>Fact: broken packages keeps sleeping into update repo.<br>Fact: QA must consider everything broken until proven contrary.<br>Fact: You failed to lead situation toward an improvement in Fedora (as mission statement says), because<br> you failed to professionally analyze user comment and make required adjustment.<br><br>Someone more open will spot the workaround in a second: <br>"Change the system to
give negative karma from start ( or consider zero karma as not acceptable for updates-repo) when a package arrives into updates-testing, thus we will ensure that some human at least tried to install and test the package before it gets with positive
karma in updates-repo this will not annoy users" .<br><br>Overall it is bad for fedora public image to have broken upupdate packages. <br><br>I personally think that you do not reflect the spirit of fedora where people are friendly and open and strive for bleeding-edge improvements.<br><br>Thanks. <br>MM.<br></div></div><br>
</div></div></div><br>
</body></html>