<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:01 AM, James Laska <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jlaska@redhat.com">jlaska@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 06:41 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:<br>
> On 10/10/10 03:13, Andre Robatino wrote:<br>
> > There's a build labeled TC1 at<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/" target="_blank">http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/</a><br>
> ><br>
> > I know this probably isn't the real TC1, since that's scheduled for October 12,<br>
> > but what happens when the real one arrives? Will it replace this one in the<br>
> > exact same directory? Will this one remain and the new one be labeled TC2?<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> What I understand from jlaska is that these will be overwritten with new<br>
> ISOs.<br>
<br>
Indeed. The images created for the scheduled 'acceptance test run' [1]<br>
were incorrectly named 'TC1'. These images are available for testing,<br>
but are *not* intended as the TC1 images which are scheduled to arrive<br>
later this week.<br></blockquote><div><br>For what it's worth, they install fine. :-)<br><br>-- <br>G.Wolfe Woodbury<br>aka redwolfe (proventesters)<br> <br></div></div>