<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/30 Adam Williamson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:awilliam@redhat.com">awilliam@redhat.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 12:07 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> yes, that was it:<br>
><br>
> yum-3.2.28-4.fc13<br>
><br>
> however, yum could have figured that putting a fc14 package over a<br>
> fc13 one is happening for one and only one reason ....<br>
<br>
</div></div>Trying to make yum 'smart' to deal with this kind of packaging problem<br>
is a really bad idea and would just lead to other stuff breaking in<br>
weird fashion, most likely. The correct fix is to not push updates like<br>
this, which will be sorted by AutoQA in future.<br>
<br>
This has been dealt with, now - a yum-3.2.28-5 has been pushed to f13<br>
and f14 which makes sure that the f14 package is versioned higher than<br>
f12's and f13's, so f12-f14 and f13-f14 upgrades should be okay now (as<br>
far as *this* problem is concerned), once the problem with updates not<br>
actually showing up in the updates repo is solved.<br>
--<br>
Adam Williamson<br>
Fedora QA Community Monkey<br>
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org<br>
<a href="http://www.happyassassin.net" target="_blank">http://www.happyassassin.net</a><br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div>this is good news, thank you very much. btw, is there a newer install dvd than rc1? </div>
</div>