<font face="courier new,monospace"><br></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, drago01 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:drago01@gmail.com">drago01@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Genes MailLists <<a href="mailto:lists@sapience.com">lists@sapience.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 06/02/2011 09:54 AM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:<br>
>> Hey folks,<br>
>><br>
><br>
> (1) I think showing the executable name for every application is vital.<br>
><br>
> Whether its directly in menu, popup or alternating pink flashing<br>
> lights .. :-)<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Sorry but I have to disagree here, cryptic executable names don't<br>
belong in the UI at all.<br></blockquote><div><br>On the contrary, I like the idea. Given the example of 'terminal emulators', I for one<br>want to know if its going to be Konsole, or gnome-terminal, or xterm...<br>
I have my favorite (ie. meets _my_ functional requirements), and I'd like to<br>know which one I'm going to get when I click on something in a menu.<br><br>Your comment on 'cryptic' executable names simply argues that<br>
'executable names shouldn't be cryptic'... and I couldn't agree more.<br><br><br></div></div>