<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Matthias Runge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mrunge@matthias-runge.de" target="_blank">mrunge@matthias-runge.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 28/06/12 14:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:<br>
><br>
> I'm not seeing this as any additional obstacle for reporters seriously<br>
> how harder is it to provide a link to a bug report vs filling in the<br>
> comment field?<br>
><br>
> JBG<br>
><br>
><br>
Do you really want a bugzilla report for each time, when dependencies break?<br></blockquote><div><br>No then again we should be catching those dependency breaks elsewhere <br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
IMHO requiring bz reports will drastically lower the number of testing<br>
reports, especially when you need to file a bug.<br></blockquote><div><br><br>Really now. <br><br>Since you seem to have those numbers ready please post them here and the method how you gathered them for let's say last 5 release cycle let's implement this for three to prove you right/wrong<br>
<br>JBG<br><a href="mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org"></a></div></div><br>