<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be moved to?</span></div><div><span>That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in this release.</span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>Just a thought.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>-Joe<br></span></div><div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Petr Schindler
<pschindl@redhat.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> test@lists.fedoraproject.org <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, July 27, 2012 10:14 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [criteria update] Rescue mode<br> </font> </div> <br>
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:<br>> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler <<a ymailto="mailto:pschindl@redhat.com" href="mailto:pschindl@redhat.com">pschindl@redhat.com</a>> said:<br>> > Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with<br>> > Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:<br>> > <br>> > 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount<br>> > (read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID (BIOS, hardware, and<br>> > software) installations'<br>> > <br>> > Reason (according to Chris): There's been no work done on rescue mode<br>> > and it is highly unlikely that it does anything at all right now.<br>> <br>> You've proposed removing rescue mode criteria from both alpha and beta;<br>> is there going to be any requirement for a functional rescue mode for<br>> this release? That's a pretty
critical thing to have completely missing<br>> from a release; things that occasionally happen such as a broken boot<br>> loader would render an install virtually unrecoverable for many users.<br><br>It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of<br>opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda<br>will have to make their best to bring rescue mod. We can also change<br>this criterion. It's on discussion. Note that those changes are<br>hopefully only for F18. In F19 there should be everything back.<br><br>-- <br>test mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org" href="mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org">test@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>To unsubscribe:<br><a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test</a><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>