<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/22/2012 08:20 AM, Arnav Kalra
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFTCzj7+WB_ieBCfKJkBQN9O8G+L6fvRPrGnuX2X1wLehDSjjA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<p>Would this method help?</p>
<p>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: "Arnav Kalra" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:arnavkalra007@gmail.com">arnavkalra007@gmail.com</a>><br>
Date: Aug 21, 2012 8:33 PM<br>
Subject: Re: Helping to improve advertising of test days and
other things<br>
To: "Fedora Marketing team" </p>
<p>If we want a method to aggregate responses we can modify smolt
a bit.<br>
1. Smolt would collect data without user's intervention in test
released and make a profile on a webpage which catalogs test
releases.<br>
2. On this page we can add a few more columns to the table in
which testers write about their test experiences.<br>
3. We can make a page which describes how to test releases as a
page which is displayed when the first time Firefox is started.
<br>
4. The qa team sees the results constantly being uploaded on
that page and analyses it together on gobby.<br>
5. I think this would solve a part of the problem.</p>
<p>What do you guys think about it?</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I dont think smolt was intended to be used like this + The more
bureaucracy that reporters need to perform will most likely result
in less participation. <br>
<br>
The only think the marketing team needs to do is advertise test days
on Twitter G+ Facebook etc.. and notify any media contacts we are in
contact with.<br>
<br>
JBG <br>
</body>
</html>