<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:awilliam@redhat.com" target="_blank">awilliam@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi <<a href="mailto:kevin@scrye.com" target="_blank">kevin@scrye.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Greetings.<br>
<br>
systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last<br>
night<br>
(as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release).<br>
<br>
However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users<br>
will see an error about the package not being signed.<br>
<br>
This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in<br>
tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to<br>
update, or<br>
if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use<br>
--nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></blockquote></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>BTW, any special reason for not having --nogpgcheck documented on "man fedup" ?<br></div><div> <br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
I'm the reporter of bug<br>
</div><a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/<u></u>show_bug.cgi?id=1038863</a> [1] and I'm trying<div class="im"><br>
fedup 0.8.0 as suggested on this issue. I got the same error, but for<br>
the package systemd-libs:<br>
<br>
Package systemd-libs-208-9.fc20.x86_<u></u>64.rpm is not signed<br>
<br>
Is this package also corrected?<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
They all come from the same source package, so yes, it will be.<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div> <br></div><div>Thanks for the info.<br></div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>BrunoJCM
</div></div>