<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 14/12/13 12:49, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHc5q3e2uvi3U0eg3zt657KjdT8FCXB-ZBGQPbAzQ9bpcWaaJg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi<br>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM,
Adam Williamson <span dir="ltr"></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>
Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release
criteria that say<br>
"we really stand behind the package sets installed from
the DVD" if we<br>
don't.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That is true however the solution is not to weaken
the release criteria but decide a) do we need the DVD
anymore b) if we need it, whether there is anything
against trimming down the default package sets to be
consistent with what is included in the live images.
With the new model, I think the right answer is to drop
the DVD image entirely but b) is the minimum we should
do. <br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Rahul<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
I use use DVD's to initially load the system, sometimes I've given
copies to others.<br>
<br>
Possibly I should again try a net install?<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Gavin<br>
</body>
</html>