L10N Infrastructure Roadmap (was Re: FLP Meeting 2009-01-28 IRC Log)

Noriko Mizumoto noriko at redhat.com
Tue Feb 3 23:28:26 UTC 2009


[snip]
> Since the first recorded Transifex-commit in Nov 2007 until Dec 2008, 176 out of ~450 unique FAS users (in the cvsl10n group) committed translations through the system, a few commits away from a total of 5000 commits to 86 modules. Transifex remained fairly stable for F10 Translations, but Damned Lies was (as usual) acting up on a regular basis. Documentation-statistics for Publican didn't work for F10, as Damned Lies has issues with having a PO file for each XML file withing a project.
> 
> The new Django-based Damned Lies and Transifex looks promising, and will hopefully solve many of the issues we experienced through the F9+F10 cycle.
> 
> However, at this stage I want to take a step back from the technical reality of our existing L10N workflow and systems, and look at where we want to go with Fedora L10N onwards. 

Hi,

I am not going to disturb the discussion, but I'd like to recap the 
schedule for F11. It is 10th March, Software String Freeze is.
Untill we reach new Transifex and/or any other tools, systems 
well-tested and accepted, current Tx (submit) + DL (stats & download) 
are running.

We have experienced problems with DL for F10, and it needs the 
maintainer who can be responsible *till new things coming and taking 
over completely.
Then DL can be safely and happily retired.

Maintaining DL is imperative for translators.

Anyone?

noriko




More information about the trans mailing list