L10N migration to transifex.net

[Ricky Zhou]

On 2011-02-21 03:01:10 PM, noriko wrote:
> It won't disturb other teams such as developers and web team by imposing 
> the task for move as well.
Actually, that's not the case - if we upgrade to 1.1, all projects that
use Transifex for translations will still have to change their workflow
for the new version in the same way that they would have to with moving
to transifex.net.

The reason is that since version 1.0, Transifex no longer talks directly
to version controls systems - instead they switched to a model where
Transifex stores strings in its database and project maintainers pull
translated strings into their own repos as part of their workflow.

I still don't understand why some people seem so against switching to
transifex.net though :-/

Thanks,
Ricky
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/trans/attachments/20110221/2f72743a/attachment.bin