Another problem when using Livna.org yum updates
alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de
Thu Oct 28 22:45:44 UTC 2004
Am Fr, den 29.10.2004 schrieb Douglas Furlong um 0:11:
> Your subjects states "another problem when using Livna.org yum updates".
Exactly, I first did read the subject and see " livna.org - yum -
> If you look at the name of this fileFEDORA-LEGACY-GPG-KEY it should be
> fairly self explanitory that this is the GPG key for the fedora legacy
Yes, and then the Fedora Legacy GPG key import mentioned. So I thought
"he tries to use rpm.livna.org repository and imports the fedora legacy
> In light of Alexanders statement, that Fedora Legacy is different from
> Livna, one could guess that we may require another key, for Livna. Now
> he didn't make this clear, but he may have made the above assumption.
Thank you Douglas for your kind efford to make my thinking (more)
> But yes, it may not be obvious that each repository is almost certanly
> going to have it's own key (unless they are related, like Livna, Livna
> testing, Fedora Main, Fedora Updates, Fedora Testing, Fedora
> Development, etc...)
The unofficial FAQ site has some notes about this:
> Alexander is one of the most helpful people in this group, I think your
> critasism is a bit over board.
I can deal with criticism. In this case we have basic misunderstandings
on both sides? Maybe I did not recognize the point where "Beartooth"
> Yes at times he can be "short" with people, but very rarely is rude,
> please, you should also take in to account that his first langauge is
> NOT english, and as such he may appear more abrupt then he would in his
> native tongue.
Yes, unfortunately I have to live with the risk to misexpress. And if
"Beartooth" is a "professional explicator of texts" (his words) he knows
that misunderstanding each other is the usual case in the field of
communication through words - the risks of interpretation ;)
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp
Serendipity 00:24:54 up 8 days, 21:04, load average: 0.22, 0.38, 0.44
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041029/b8d40a6e/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the users