testing threading - please ignore
charlescurley at charlescurley.com
Wed Mar 2 13:37:25 UTC 2005
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:04:40PM -0600, David Hoffman wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:23:28 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> > This is because the tool handling the threading is using the References:
> > headers in the email to do it, rather than the naive Subject:-based
> > method used by the MARC-archives.
> That's probably what gmail is basing theirs on as well.
> Looking at this thread and then the "changed" one... shows up as two
> different threads in gmail.
Then gmail is broken, as I have suspected. I wonder what else is
broken about it? No, don't answer, I won't use gmail unless they fix
I use mutt, and it handles the threading correctly. I did not see a
new thread when the subject changed. But then the authors of mutt go
out of their way to be compliant with the relevant RFCs.
Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050302/b86cf9a2/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the users