Kernel Differences Woes
gilboad at gmail.com
Tue Jun 6 12:49:03 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 08:55 -0400, Rickey Moore wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 23:12 -0500, Rod Haper wrote:
> > Sam,
> > Thanks for the reply and suggestion. I guess I'll go ahead and file
> > bugzilla reports for the two systems but I won't hold my breath. I've
> > searched bugzilla several times for similar problems without any luck.
> > I suspect the problem is related to changes in udev. In the meantime,
> > I'll just continue running FC4 with the old 1369 kernel.
> I'm getting a new Athlon 64 machine this week (finally!!) to replace
> this ole AMD P3 clunker and I'm darn near seriously worried about
> installing FC5 to it. Is there a concensus of opinion that FC4 is more
> solid with Nvidia hardware? I'm getting some good stuff and I have to
> get into development mode with this machine, for serious... not a
> play-toy. Any thoughts? Advice? Caveats? Ric
I'm got a large number of HP wx9300 and Tyan Tiger/Thunder K8WE (all are
dual (dual core) Opteron workstations/servers based on the nVidia NF4
chipset) running FC4/64 and FC5/64 (and CentOS) without a problem.
All of them are SCSI based, so I can't really comment on problems with
the SATA controller, (I though.
I'd venture to guess that the SATA controller will work just fine in
stand-alone mode, but will fail miserably in RAID mode... pure guess,
> A: Because it's annoying to read.
> Q: Why is top-posting bad?
> A: Top posting.
> Q: What's the most annoying thing about usenet?
I suddenly feel the urge to top post ;)
More information about the users