that old GNU/Linux argument
maximilianbianco at gmail.com
Mon Jul 21 17:39:13 UTC 2008
2008/7/20 Mikkel L. Ellertson <mikkel at infinity-ltd.com>:
> Björn Persson wrote:
>> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>>> Björn Persson wrote:
>>>> Fedora isn't Linux, it's a Linux distribution, but everyone calls all
>>>> Linux distributions "Linux", so Fedora should be called "Linux" even
>>>> though it isn't Linux? Is that what you're saying? Unfortunately that
>>>> doesn't help much with defining what Linux *is*.
>>>> Or do you mean that Fedora isn't *equal* to Linux, it's just *a* Linux,
>>>> but everyone calls all Linuxes "Linux"?
>>> It is kind of like the difference between a car, a Ford, and a
>>> Mustang. A car does not have to be a Ford to be a car. A Ford doea
>>> not have to be a Mustang. But it is still correct to call a Mustang
>>> a car.
>> Should I take that to mean that your concept of "Linux" is the same as
>> Thomas Cameron's, whatever his concept really is?
>> Björn Persson
> No - just that I think the argument is equivalent is like complaining about
> someone calling a Mustang a car, instead of calling it a Ford Mustang.
> Calling a distribution Linux is less specific then calling it by the
> distribution name, but it is not less correct then calling a specific car by
> the generic name car.
I think the point being made is that Linux refers to the engine not
the car. Car refers to all the parts including the
If opinions were really like assholes we'd each have just one
More information about the users