"One or more disks are failing" ?
Bruno Wolff III
bruno at wolff.to
Sat Jul 4 17:25:47 UTC 2009
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 13:38:12 +0200,
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> In other words, you're playing Russian roulette as you cannot know
> how long the drive will continue to run even with a growing number of
> reallocated sectors. If you decide to keep this drive running, watch
> above value carefully, but even if it doesn't increase quickly, there
> may be sudden death of this drive.
But there can be sudden death without any warning with a chance of the
same order of magnitude. Sure if you have lots of money relative to the
value of the data it's a good idea to change the drive. For hobbiests
it may make more sense to squeeze some more life out of the drive.
> > > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always
> > > - 2
> This is worse than above. It ought to be zero. The internal hard-disk
> controller has not reallocated these two sectors yet.
Drives typcially won't reallocate bad sectors if they can't get a good read
or the operation is a write. This is to give you a chance to recover the data
if you want to try. And if you want to spend some effort, you can figure out
what files, if any, were using these blocks.
More information about the users