Top posting
Michael Hennebry
hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
Fri Jun 25 19:20:53 UTC 2010
Fool.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/06/10 16:53, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> --snip--
> People do, continue to and will always top post
>>
>> Thanks for the comment. Although I do try to work within the standards of a
>> group, I do prefer top posting, but do not mind reading emails otherwise
>> composed. The argument does seem similar to the egg wars in 'Gulliver's
>> Travels.'
Nyet.
The best that can be said about top-posting is that
it is better than bottom-posting without trimming.
Internal- and bottom-posting allow responses
to be near their inspirations.
Also, top-posting strongly correlates with a failure to trim.
Rather a lot of the noise is quoted boilerplate.
> But on this list: guidelines as sig.
> Top is frowned upon.
> I see it as "When in Rome"
Don't encourage them.
--
Michael hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist: The glass is half full.
Engineer: The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."
More information about the users
mailing list