Can't solve problem with NFS-server access

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Tue Nov 30 11:57:16 UTC 2010


On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 00:06 +0200, Alan Holt wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I can't understand ? If I will do 192.168.1.0/24 ? I
> will never have success, because I don't have any PC in my network
> with IP-address 192.168.1.0

In this instance, when you're writing an IP address with that netmask
combination, you're saying *ANY* address on that subnet range.

i.e. If you wrote just 192.168.1.12 only that IP would match.  But when
you wrote 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0, it means 192.168.1.0 through to
192.168.1.255.  Though, practically, it usually means 192.168.1.1
through to 192.168.1.254, since the .0 and .255 ending addresses have
their own special uses.

Depending on where you're using IP addresses ending with .0 or .255, you
will be describing a whole subnet, rather than specific IPs.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.





More information about the users mailing list