OT: Improving laptop wifi reception
Marko Vojinovic
vvmarko at gmail.com
Thu Aug 25 14:43:42 UTC 2011
On Thursday 25 August 2011 13:24:00 Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I suspect that receiver quality is a bigger factor that transmitter
> power output. I am presently using a Linksys E3000 running DD-WRT which
> displays some receiving data [SNR, signal to noise ratio]. I have no way
> of verifying these numbers but have no reason to doubt them either. I
> have also noticed that signal quality affects the data rates. Good
> signal, faster transfers ...
>
> > Wireless Nodes
> >
> > Clients
> > MAC Address Interface Uptime TX Rate RX Rate Signal
> > Noise SNR Signal Quality
> > 00:1E:52:86:4B:C3 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -42 -88 46
> > 64%
> > B8:FF:61:35:AC:CC eth1 N/A N/A N/A -52 -88 36
> > 52%
> > 00:1F:1F:A5:D6:84 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -62 -88 26
> > 39%
> > 00:AA:BB:CC:DD:10 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -67 -88 21
> > 33%
> > 0C:EE:E6:84:F3:A9 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -55 -88 33
> > 48%
> > 00:11:85:8C:CC:25 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -61 -88 27
> > 40%
> > 00:02:6F:9B:BA:C4 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -42 -88 46
> > 64%
> > 00:1D:73:C9:11:94 eth1 N/A N/A N/A -57 -88 31
> > 45%
I'm confused --- there is the "Signal" column, the "Noise" column, and the
"SNR" column which apparently has nothing to do with the ratio between signal
and noise. In addition, how is the "Signal Quality" estimated?
Little help, please? :-)
Best, :-)
Marko
More information about the users
mailing list