The Linus view of GNOME 3.2

[Reindl Harald]

Am 05.12.2011 08:11, schrieb Misha Shnurapet:
> 03.12.2011, 13:48, "Sam Varshavchik" <mrsam at courier-mta.com>:
>>  It's not that stuff has merely changed. It's that the stuff has changed,
>>  major parts of existing functionality were removed without having any
>>  functional replacements
> 
> There is no arguing that the new GNOME 3 is a significant change. 
> But what you had with GNOME 2 was a result of about a decade of development. 
> You want the same user experience

SURELY!

nobody forced the developers to throw all away and start from scratch
if they decide to do so the should hol d back their crap until it is
ready or learn what refactoring is and maintain the existing code

or have you ever heard that someone considered throw away the whole
kernel-code which has a much older history than GNOME?

thats the difference netween developers and morons

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20111205/02f8dc00/attachment.bin