R: Re: Openfoam is available!!!

[antonio.montagnani at alice.it]

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: pocallaghan at gmail.com
>Data: 22-dic-2011 
16.22
>A: 
>Ogg: Re: Openfoam is available!!!
>
>On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47 
+0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
>> > On Thu, 2011-
12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> >> Openfoam is available for F15 and 
F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>> >>
>> >> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.phpI
>> >> 
think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
>> >> 
module load openmpii386 in case of 32 bit.
>> >
>> > I must say I get a bit fed 
up with announcements of this sort, which
>> > can't even be bothered including 
a line of description about what the
>> > thing is. Why should I be forced to 
open a Web page to find if I have
>> > any interest in this?
>> >
>> > poc
>> >

>> > --
>> > users mailing list
>> > users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To 
unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users>> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org>> 
>> Openfoam 
has been discussed some time ago on this list, and there was
>> a group 
interested in packaging it: nobody compels you to open any
>> page, but I do 
not care if you didn't follow the thread a while ago.
>
>You still don't get it 
do you? The fact that some random package was
>discussed a while back is no 
reason not to include a one-line
>description reminding people what it is. It's 
not like we're talking
>about gcc or X or the kernel. It's a niche interest, 
but of course I
>know that only because of information from another poster, 
since your
>reply adds precisely no useful information to what you posted

>originally.
>
>poc
>
>-- 

never heard of Google??