btrfs to be standard fs for Fedora 16?

Mikkel L. Ellertson mellertson at gmail.com
Fri Jun 10 17:03:41 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/10/2011 11:27 AM, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>>> Is there one for LVM, yet?  Because I don't recall lack of error
>>> correction programs preventing LVM being inflicted upon us.
> 
> Mikkel L. Ellertson:
>> LVM is not a file system. It is more on the line of a partitioning
>> setup. You check the individual file systems contained in the LVM
>> partitions, not the partition. Part of this is that the LVM
>> partition may span more then one drive.
> 
> Let me put it this way, then:  If you try to boot a system, and the
> filesystem within the LVM is stuffed, are you going to be able to do a
> rudimentary boot (ala runlevel 1) and fsck it to sort it out?
> 
> On a completely non LVM installation, if there was enough of the
> filesystem around, you could do that.  I don't recall that it was
> possible if your system used LVM.
> 
Nope. It is equivalent to trying to boot a system with a hosed
partition table. You have to get out a rescue disk that understands
LVM. I believe you can use the install medium in the rescue mode to
do it, but I have never had to do it. I have only one system using
LVM, and I have not broken it yet. (Knock on wood)

I should probably mention that I am not a big LVM fan. But I have
been running Linux long enough that I have a fairly good idea on how
big I need each partition to be. I also tend to have more partitions
then the "average" user, and a large drive for things that do not
get changed when I update. (Music, movies, CD and DVD images, my
e-book collection, etc.)

Mikkel
- -- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3yTm0ACgkQqbQrVW3JyMS35wCeL5OM6VlzEWdU5V6Du7RhHWqN
v2sAnjGryYhLs69EFA0n6z+cwEqkcGGT
=O6/k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the users mailing list