Failure to detect dependency...whose responsible?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 29 May 2011 21:52:52 +0800
Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko at greshko.com> wrote:

> On 05/29/2011 09:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > What does:
> >
> > rpm -q kernel
> >
> > return?
> 
> That would be....
> 
> 2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64   (as mentioned in the first post...  :-) )

Only that ? or also 2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15 ?
> 
> > Do you have the 2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15 kernel installed?
> 
> Yes, it is still installed.  I think I have it set to keep 3 kernels.

Then thats why. rpmfusion doesn't have one for your current kernel, but
it does for the release kernel. Since that kernel is installed (even
though it's not booted), it will meet the dep. 
:) 

> >> >  I can't do another test on that system at the moment since it
> >> > is busy doing a long job....  My luck the issue will go away by
> >> > the time it is done sometime tomorrow.:-(
> > Pesky work getting in the way of fun.;)
> 
> Yeah....  Worse, that system is booted to another OS and I couldn't
> even try if I wanted to....

No worries. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110529/8fe4f83b/attachment.bin