Yep, names like p4p1 are soooo much better than eth0 :-(

[Alan Evans]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2011 00:57:42 jdow wrote:
>> There is something wrong with ethp2p3? What KIND of device is easier to
>> fathom if it is part of the name, ya know.
>
> Well, I agree that would indeed be more descriptive. :-) Feel free to file a
> RFE if you think you can build a good case for it. ;-)

And make the name change *again*?