Developers responsibillity to Fedora Users

[Darryl L. Pierce]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:13:39PM +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 11:47 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > Given how small the market is for tablets (compared to the server
> > business) I would find such a statement highly questionable.
> 
> If Red Hat is still primarily concerned with the server market, then
> Gnome3 makes even less sense.

I can't speak to the RHEL side of the house WRT desktop environments. I
don't know what the plans are around Gnome 3 and future RHEL releases
based on Fedora 15+. Though I would say that I would find it odd for
servers to have graphical desktops on which the admins depend. Admins
for RHEL systems tend to be the command line type.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110928/2c46b941/attachment.bin